Press Not Reporting GOOD About Iraq?

Sure, like when did you see this photo on TV? Or in the major newspapers? Oh, those big, bad Liberals must be lying about all the good this war has done for Iraq! We've given them radiation-poisoning from DU ("depleted" uranium bullets---as if that makes them safe), and a democratic (hah! That'll be the day) government, yada, yada, yada...
THIS photo is what we've given Iraq. This is what happens in war---no matter how "smart" your weapons are, or how good your intentions. There are websites with photos of what DU does to the unborn, and you should check them out before you huff and puff over all this "Bush-bashing" by the so-called "Liberal" media. How many times do you have to hear that these companies are owned by the same people who give you Fox News? And that wonderfully touching moment at last week's Town Meeting, when a woman asked Dubya why the press keeps printing only bad things about this war, and can't the government force these nasty Liberals to tell the truth. Oh, what a heart-warming moment, folks, when Bush said (in all "sincerity") that the press can't be forced to tell the truth.
Yeah, like hell they can't. Sounds to me like a call to patriotic Republicans to demand just that! You just know your elected representatives (always fearful of appearing "soft" on terrorism) will gladly cave in on that (not to mention the fact that elections are coming up). And I include Dems in the spineless category as well. Face it, this is what democracy does. The majority of fools gets the boob of their choice---so why are we soooo shocked that Iraqis fear majority rule? Because the majority just happens to be Shiites, when Sunnis held the reins under the Baathists? Of course, we wouldn't interfere with the majority's choice, now would we? Uh uh, we'd smile and point proudly to the fruits of our labors (and if you believe that, after all the political assassinations we've done since the 1960's, you need serious help)! Iran is next, people, so how could even a twit like Dubya allow Shiites to rule Iraq?
But I'm just an EVIL LIBERAL, I guess, so go ahead and believe all the lies you hear on Rush Limbaugh and Fox. Don't say you weren't warned, though.

A Dubai-ous Business

So, we now know what "Dubya" stands for---Dubai-ya! Never a dull moment with King George, I'll tell you. He's a lame duck who thinks he can still fly, and if he does we're all going to have to keep looking up, because when a bird @#$% over your head... Well, you city-folks know what I mean. And a duck is far bigger than a measly pidgeon.
He's already decided he has the right to do whatever he wants. What used to be called "Implied Powers" are now being titled "Inherent", this from the same party that hates interpreting the Constitution broadly---or so they say. I guess when it's your "Supremes" doing the interpreting it's okay, huh. Of course, it was dear old Ronnie who signed more Executive Orders during his presidency than any previous president (Democrat or Republican). Well, he only did it because he wanted smaller government, supposedly. You can't beat one-man rule for that. Dubai-ya's only taking it to the next logical level, really. Can you blame him? Why, after all, how's a president to do his job when Congress won't jump every time he snaps his fingers! I mean, we're in a war here, one that's likely to go on forever, and you can't wait for a bunch of gobbledeegook-mouthed pin-heads to debate on whether or not something's illegal, right?
Good old King George knows what to do. He's been appointed by God, you know. Why, if those unbelievers in Congress keep on blocking Dubai-ya, they're going to burn in hell. You don't disobey God's annointed, folks. Not if you want to be "raptured" when Geee-suuuz comes back to kick ass. Oh, yeah, just read those LEFT BEHIND books. God just delights in zapping sinners, and you don't want to be there when all those guts go flying as He laughs. Bush knows these are the End Times, people. He's going to do what a man's gotta do, by God. Where is Lee Harvey Oswald when we really need him?